Mediumship

Are you a medium, or developing mediumship, how has it been for you, frustrating, rewarding?

I have been recieving messages for years since in my 20s although these messages are alot stonger than when i was alot younger, i dont like to use the words i am a Medium i tend to use the words im a Practising/Developing Medium as ive learned through the years i havent stopped learning new things . different ways in which Spirit come through, different ways the messages catch my ears and eyes , Different feelings of dettering whether its my words or Spirits , and a stonger connection as time goes by,

So the answer to this question is definatly A Deveolping Medium
And cant wait to Learn More . xxx

we are all developing mediums sparkle..... I'm only just learning the basics still

Well Somer if thats what you do is call the Basics i cant wait till im at that level XXX

somersethedge wrote:

we are all developing mediums sparkle.....

Isn't this the truth, none of us are ever fully developed mediums, mediumship is a journey not a destination, though you can be an experienced medium I don't believe anyone is ever a fully fledged medium.

Now thats the expression Jay " Experienced " That i would use xxx

sparklewings wrote:

Well Somer if thats what you do is call the Basics

teh hrad patr si hititng het yeks ni teh rgiht rdoer

Worringly I understood that

sparklewings wrote:

I have been recieving messages for years since in my 20s although these messages are alot stonger than when i was alot younger, i dont like to use the words i am a Medium i tend to use the words im a Practising/Developing Medium as ive learned through the years i havent stopped learning new things . different ways in which Spirit come through, different ways the messages catch my ears and eyes , Different feelings of dettering whether its my words or Spirits , and a stonger connection as time goes by,

So the answer to this question is definatly A Deveolping Medium
And cant wait to Learn More . xxx

what a lovely, positive post Sparkles

somersethedge wrote:

sparklewings wrote:

Well Somer if thats what you do is call the Basics

teh hrad patr si hititng het yeks ni teh rgiht rdoer

Jay wrote:

Worringly I understood that

em oot!

oyu lla arvign dam

If you can raed this, you have a sgtrane mnid, can you raed this? olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can, i cdnuolt blveiee taht i cluod aulactly uesdnatnrd waht i was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabridge Uinervtisy, it dseno't ,mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtn tihng is taht the frsit and last ltteer be in the rghit plcae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raed it whotuit a pboerlm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and i awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!!

lol.. i got it all thanks! oo does that make me a uni boff? :wendy:

LTYLOTA ERGE

sparklewings wrote:

LTYLOTA ERGE

tawny wrote:

sparklewings wrote:

LTYLOTA ERGE

holy moly is that scottish

scarily easy to read but i've done the gobbledy gook that is shorthand and i'm a whizz at anagrams, all that said had that been numbers i'd be calling for the shrinks